Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)

Piszcz, Anna

Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)

Abstract

In the decision RPZ 21/2005 issued on 21 July 2005, the UOKiK President established an infringement of Article 8(2)(5) and (1) of the Act of 15 December 2000 on Competition and Consumer Protection (hereafter, Competition Act 2000) by the poultry producer DROP S.A. (hereafter, DROP). DROP was found to have abused its dominant position in the purchase markets of duck hatching eggs and goose hatching eggs. The competition authority identified abuses in the form of: − counteracting the formation of conditions necessary for the emergence or development of competition (in this case – in the veterinary services market), and − the imposition of unfair trading conditions.

Is the forcing of services on suppliers an abuse of a dominant position? Case comment to the judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)

Authors

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

License

Abstract

Description

Keywords

Citation

URI

Belongs to collection