Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorBrzeziński, Szymon
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-15T09:34:18Z
dc.date.available2016-11-15T09:34:18Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationSzymon Brzeziński, A 16. - 17. századi lengyel-magyar kapcsolatok Hopp Lajos munkásságában, "Barokk. Történelem – irodalom – művészet” (különszám 2010), p. 319 – 327.pl_PL
dc.identifier.issn1234-3233
dc.identifier.urihttps://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/10710
dc.description.abstractThe author presents the scholarly achievements of a Hungarian literary historian Lajos Hopp (1927–1996) related to the Polish-Hungarian relations. It is a commentary to the fragment (conclusions) of Hopp’s unedited work published in the present issue of Barok, entitled “Changes of Polish-Hungarian ideas and traditions in the first half of the 17th century”. The study is kept in the Illyés Gyula Archives and Workshop of the Institute of Literary Studies of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Budapest. It is an expanded and revised version of a dissertation entitled “Changes of Polish-Hungarian ideas and traditions in Baroque court literature” submitted by Hopp in 1987 to be awarded doctorate by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The presented fragment exemplifies the whole of Hopp research into the Polish-Hungarian relations in which he emphasised the endurance and changes of traditions of: “everlasting friendship”, “friendly relations” and the idea of bulwark in both the cultures from the late Middle Ages to the 18th century. Some of the thoughts were presented in Hopp’s monographs published in print. The discussed text refers to the period from the end of the 16th century (from Stephen Báthory’s death in 1586) to 1648 (the death of Wladyslaw IV Vasa, George [György] I Rákóczi). As he says, at that time the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and Transylvania drifted apart politically due to, in his opinion, increasing religious differences and successes of the counterreformation in the Commonwealth, as well as political alliances of Sigismund III Vasa. The change came during the reign of Wladyslaw IV Vasa, when George I Rákóczi devised plans to acquire the Polish crown. The author debate the significance of Hopp’s research. His statements about social conditioning of the sphere of idea (its “social basis”) and Marxising interpretations, although moderated with time, seem to be outdated now. In his reasoning, Hopp departed from the approach characteristic of literary historians (research on topoi, metaphors, rhetoric), and got closer to interdisciplinary understood history of ideas (history of concepts) and “classic” political history. This found its expression in his source base, too, which included also texts related to a political practice. It was valuable that he included the history of ideas into his research on political relations. A reconstruction of Hopp’s methods causes difficulties – his language was complicated and he did not formulate his methodological assumptions or concepts used (for instance, a “historico-cultural form of consciousness” or “consciousness of community”, etc.). A reception of his research outside Hungary was hampered by lack of translations. In the author’s opinion, what is worth to emphasise in Hopp’s achievements related to Polish-Hungarian themes is the subject of his research – comparative studies in the history of political ideas and concepts in Central Eastern Europe. In recent years similar postulates were formulated by Hungarian scholars due to a reception of current trends in Western historiography. Some signs of interest in the language of politics and history of concepts are to be seen also in Poland. It seems sound, therefore, to refer in this context to Lajos Hopp’s research that could prompt us to reflect on possibilities and methodological form of its continuation.pl_PL
dc.language.isootherpl_PL
dc.publisherWydawnictwo Neritonpl_PL
dc.rightsDozwolony użytek
dc.subjectművelődéspl_PL
dc.subjectkora újkorpl_PL
dc.subjecttopospl_PL
dc.subjectI Rzeczpospolitapl_PL
dc.subjectPolish-Lithuanian Commonwealthpl_PL
dc.subjectPoland-Lithuaniapl_PL
dc.subjectbarokpl_PL
dc.subjectXVI-XVII wiekpl_PL
dc.subjectWęgrypl_PL
dc.subjectSiedmiogródpl_PL
dc.subjecthistoria Węgierpl_PL
dc.subjectliteratura węgierskapl_PL
dc.subjectkultura staropolskapl_PL
dc.subjectErdélypl_PL
dc.subjectrégi magyar irodalompl_PL
dc.subjectirodalmárpl_PL
dc.subjectkutatáspl_PL
dc.subjectlengyel történelempl_PL
dc.subjectLengyelországpl_PL
dc.subjectmagyar történelempl_PL
dc.subjectconceptual historypl_PL
dc.subjectbarokkpl_PL
dc.subjectmagyar irodalompl_PL
dc.subjectmagyar történetíráspl_PL
dc.subjectprzedmurzepl_PL
dc.subjectEarly Polish literaturepl_PL
dc.subjectPoland-Lithuaniapl_PL
dc.subjectPolish historypl_PL
dc.subjectPolandpl_PL
dc.subjectCentral Eastern Europepl_PL
dc.subjectCentral Europepl_PL
dc.subjectHopp Lajospl_PL
dc.subject17th centurypl_PL
dc.subject16th centurypl_PL
dc.subjectantemuralepl_PL
dc.subjectPolish-Hungarian relationshippl_PL
dc.subjectTransylvaniapl_PL
dc.subjectHungarypl_PL
dc.subjectearly modern literaturepl_PL
dc.subjectearly modern historypl_PL
dc.subjectretorykapl_PL
dc.subjectrhetoricpl_PL
dc.subjectBatorypl_PL
dc.subjectRákóczipl_PL
dc.subjectRakoczypl_PL
dc.subjectBethlenpl_PL
dc.subjectBáthory Istvánpl_PL
dc.subjectBáthorypl_PL
dc.titleA 16. - 17. századi lengyel-magyar kapcsolatok Hopp Lajos munkásságábanpl_PL
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlepl_PL
dc.contributor.organizationUniwersytet Warszawskipl
dc.description.epersonSzymon Brzeziński


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Dozwolony użytek
Korzystanie z tego materiału jest możliwe zgodnie z właściwymi przepisami o dozwolonym użytku lub o innych wyjątkach przewidzianych w przepisach prawa, a korzystanie w szerszym zakresie wymaga uzyskania zgody uprawnionego.