Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNiedziałkowski, Krzysztof
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-10T07:55:53Z
dc.date.available2017-05-10T07:55:53Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-15
dc.identifier.otherdoi 10.1515/frp-2016-0037
dc.identifier.urihttps://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/12045
dc.description.abstractThis study outlines the main motives of foresters opposing the enlargement of the Białowieża National Park to include areas managed by the State Forests Holding. The motives were identified using discourse analysis tools based on the semistructured interviews with 36 people representing various groups of actors engaged in the discussion on the management of the Białowieża Forest. The main motives I found are connected to: (1) a vision of how nature should be and the foresters’ mission; (2) fear of losing employment or getting a worse job; (3) the high esteem of the forester profession in local communities and an inferior vocational status of the national park employees; (4) defending the professional prestige of foresters and the State Forests Holding; (5) competition with national parks over natural areas; (6) forest science; (7) the wish to continue hunting in the Białowieża Forest; (8) bottom-up pressure on the State Forests Holding employees. The major conflict potential in the discourse around the Białowieża Forest is connected with the perception of its unique natural values and methods of protection. As a result, two opposing coalitions have formed: one supporting forestry interests and one encouraging conservation. The discourse of the forestry-supporting coalition is strengthened by an epistemic community of forest scientists. Some arguments presented by the foresters pushing for a continuation of forest management in Białowieża also indicate the involvement of path dependency, which, in combination with large differences between the coalitions, does not allow for optimism regarding the resolution of the conflict.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was conducted with the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (grant no. N N305 353339) and the European Commission (project BIORESC, 6 PR: Grant No. MTKD-CT-2005-029957 and the project BIOCONSUS 7 PR: Grant No. 245737)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInstytut Badawczy Lesnictwa (Forest Research Institute), Sekocin Stary, Polanden
dc.rightsUznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pl/*
dc.subjectenvironmental conflicten
dc.subjectforestersen
dc.subjectmotivationen
dc.subjectdiscourse coalitionsen
dc.subjectnature conservationen
dc.subjectbiodiversityen
dc.subjectprotected areasen
dc.titleWhy do foresters oppose the enlargement of the Białowieża National Park? The motivation of the State Forests Holding employees as perceived by social actors engaged in the conflict over the Białowieża Foresten
dc.title.alternativeDlaczego leśnicy nie chcą rozszerzenia Białowieskiego Parku Narodowego? Motywacja pracowników Państwowego Gospodarstwa Leśnego Lasy Państwowe w perspektywie aktorów społecznych zaangażowanych w dyskusję wokół Puszczy Białowieskiejpl
dc.typearticleen
dc.contributor.organizationThe Institute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences*, ul. Nowy Świat 72, 00–330 Warszawa, Poland; The Mammal Research Institute of the Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Waszkiewicza 1, 17–230 Białowieża, Polanden


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Bez utworów zależnych 3.0 Polska