dc.contributor.author | Kalantari, Esmaeel | |
dc.contributor.author | Montazer, Gholamali | |
dc.contributor.author | Ghazinoory, Sepehr | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-09T14:49:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-09T14:49:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kalantari, E., Montazer, G., & Ghazinoory, S. (2021)l. Mapping of a science and technology policy network based on social network analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 17(3), 115-147. https://doi.org/10.7341/20211734 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 2299-7326 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/20374 | |
dc.description.abstract | PURPOSE: The main purpose of this paper is to define a science and technology policy
network in the form of a social network, from the perspective of policy documents,
and then analyze it using the social networks analysis (SNA) method. METHODOLOGY:
As a case study, the science and technology policymaking network in Iran is analyzed
using the suggested framework in this research. The data used in this study were
collected through the content analysis of 25 policy documents and an interview with
20 Iranian science and technology policy elites, before being interpreted using the
social network analysis method and software such as NetDraw and UCINet.
FINDINGS: The most pivotal science and technology policymaking institutions
in Iran and the interactions between them were determined from the network
viewpoint. This was achieved by performing a two-dimensional core-periphery
analysis, identifying the cut points and blocks, and measuring the structural power
of each institution using the degree centrality, closeness centrality, and betweenness
centrality methods. IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORY AND PRACTICE: The most
important practical implications of this research are: the integration of a number
of policymaking institutions, the division of clear and precise work between policy
institutions, the design of vertical and horizontal coordination mechanisms between
institutions, the elimination of interferences of some institutions in the tasks of the
others, the design of complementary mechanisms to control the role of cutting
points, and paying attention to the important activities in the margins of the network.
ORIGINALITY AND VALUE: The most important contribution of this research is to
develop a framework for studying science and technology policy and then to develop
a method for studying science and technology policy based on SNA. Therefore, the
framework for studying science and technology policy in a cycle consists of three
stages: 1- Agenda setting and prioritization (at two levels of mega policies and meta
policies); 2- Design and implementation or executive policies (in three parts: demandside
policies, supply-side policies, and networking and interconnection infrastructure
policies); 3- evaluation and policy learning. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Cognitione Foundation for the Dissemination of Knowledge and Science | en |
dc.rights | Uznanie autorstwa-Użycie niekomercyjne-Na tych samych warunkach 3.0 Polska | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/pl/ | * |
dc.subject | science and technology policy | en |
dc.subject | policy network | en |
dc.subject | social network analysis | en |
dc.subject | SNA | en |
dc.subject | structural power | en |
dc.subject | Iran | en |
dc.title | Mapping of a science and technology policy network based on social network analysis | en |
dc.type | article | en |
dc.contributor.organization | Tarbiat Modares University, Iran | en |