Pokaż uproszczony rekord

dc.contributor.authorFirlej, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorZaborowicz, Katarzyna
dc.contributor.authorZaborowicz, Maciej
dc.contributor.authorFirlej, Ewa
dc.contributor.authorDomagała, Ivo
dc.contributor.authorPieniak, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorIgielska-Kalwat, Joanna
dc.contributor.authorDmowski, Artur
dc.contributor.authorBiedziak, Barbara
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-12T10:08:26Z
dc.date.available2022-05-12T10:08:26Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-09
dc.identifier.citationFirlej M, Zaborowicz K, Zaborowicz M, Firlej E, Domagała I, Pieniak D, Igielska-Kalwat J, Dmowski A, Biedziak B. Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(9):5775. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095775 ; https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/9/5775en
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601
dc.identifier.otherDOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095775
dc.identifier.urihttps://depot.ceon.pl/handle/123456789/21279
dc.description.abstractOrthodontic retention is the final important stage of orthodontic treatment, the aim of which is to consolidate the functional and aesthetic position of teeth. Among adults, fixed retainers made of different types of wires are the most common. The aim of this study was to analyse the mechanical properties of a new generation of fixed orthodontic retainers—printed by 3D printers. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted using samples made of Nextdent MFH C&B N1 resin in the form of cuboid bars with nominal dimensions of width b = 3 mm, thickness d = 0.8 mm; 1 mm; 1.2 mm, length l = 30 mm for each type. The influence of the thickness of the retainers on their strength under loaded conditions was evaluated. Flexural strength, elastic properties, deflection, and creep were compared. The samples were aged in an artificial saliva bath at 37 ± 1 ◦C during the strength tests. Results: It was shown that differences in the thickness of the samples affected their elastic and strength properties. The highest average flexural modulus, the highest deflection, creep, and strength was characteristic of the samples with the highest thickness (1.2 mm). Samples with an average thickness of 1 mm had the lowest modulus of elasticity. Conclusions: The mechanical properties of 3D printed retainers show that they can be an alternative to metal retainers and the procedure of making new retainers, especially when patients have aesthetic requirements or allergies to metals.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rightsCreative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode*
dc.subjectdigital orthodonticen
dc.subjectlingual retaineren
dc.subject3D printing in orthodonticen
dc.subjectCAD/CAM in orthodonticsen
dc.subjectaligneren
dc.titleMechanical Properties of 3D Printed Orthodontic Retainersen
dc.typearticleen
dc.contributor.organizationDepartment of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Anomalies, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Polanden
dc.contributor.organizationDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Polanden
dc.contributor.organizationFaculty of Transport and Computer Science, University of Economics and Innovations in Lublin, Polanden


Pliki tej pozycji

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Pozycja umieszczona jest w następujących kolekcjach

Pokaż uproszczony rekord

Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0
Poza zaznaczonymi wyjątkami, licencja tej pozycji opisana jest jako Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa 4.0