Nazistowska polityka okupacyjna i losy Cyganów na Ukrainie: „białe plamy” i obszary dalszych badań
Streszczenie
The fate of the Romani population in Ukraine of the wartime period is still remaining
understudied. The article deals with the data known to date on the Nazi policies
towards Roma in various zones of the German rule (left-bank Ukraine under Wehrmacht administration, right-bank Ukraine under the civil rule of the Reichskommissariat Ukraine), as well as of the Romanian administered area of Transnistria. Survey of the sources on the subject known today brings to the preliminary conclusion that while in the zones under military rule the Roma primarily were regarded by the Wehrmacht and the SS as “unreliable elements” potentially dangerous for the security and therefore subjected to extermination with no difference between “sedentary” and “itinerant” Roma (with few exceptions like Crimea), the civil German authorities practiced more differentiated approaches to the “Gypsy question”. Further research should be done to confirm or disprove this hypothesis as well as to describe the dynamics in the Roma policies in closer connection to the approaches of the lower-level authorities. The attitude of the local non-Romani population towards the persecution of the Roma is considered on both organizational (OUN and UPA) and individual levels; the issues requiring further examination are reviewed. Ʒi adadives nane śukär pinʒardo so nakhlǎs i rromani populàcia p-i Ukraìna and-o
2-to Sasundalìtko maripen. O artìklo anel informàcia pal-i polìtika e nacistenqëri
karing-o Rroma and-o zòne tel-o nacistìtko raʒ (zervi rig e Ukrainaqëri tel-e Wehrmachtaqëri administràcia, daxni rig e Ukrainaqëri tel-o civìlo raipen e Reichskommisariat Ukraina), thaj vi and-i Trasnìstria, okona tel-i rumunìtko administràcia. Katar-o sigutno dikhipen p-o adadives pinʒarde xainga, śaj anas angluni konklùzia sos säs diferènce maśkär-o thana. Pe jekh rig and-o zòne tel-i militàro raʒ, i Wehrmacht aj o SS-ǎ dikhen säs e Rromen sar bipakǎmne elemèntǎ, eventual ziandvale e sarbaripnasqe thaj säs len godi te mudaren len saren, bi diferenciaqëro maśkär-o phirutne aj o beślǎrde (säs sadaj tikne ekcèpcie p-i Krim). Pe javër rig o germanìtko civìlo bare raja keren säs butedër sanikani diferenciàcia karing-o “Rromano pućhipen”. Kamlǒl pes te kerdǒl dureder rodlǎripen vaś jekh konfirmàcia ja disprovàcia akala hipotezaqëri thaj te dikhas savi säs i dinàmika e rromane politikenqëre paśedër e terenosqëre rajença. O tordǒpen e gaʒenqëro karing-e Rromenqëri persekùcia si analizuime p-o duj organizacionàlo (OUN aj UPA) thaj individuàlo nivèlǎ. Mothovdǒn vi save pućhimàta kamlǒn duredër rodlǎrde.
Kolekcje
- Artykuły / Articles [16165]
Korzystanie z tego materiału jest możliwe zgodnie z właściwymi przepisami o dozwolonym użytku lub o innych wyjątkach przewidzianych w przepisach prawa, a korzystanie w szerszym zakresie wymaga uzyskania zgody uprawnionego.